|
#44 One-book
Repertoires, Online Bargain
ChessPublishing & ChessPub; website;
http://www.chesspublishing.com
(Please
click on the images to buy the books.)

Attacking with 1 e4;
John Emms;
160 pages; Everyman 2001

Meeting 1 e4;
Alexander Raetsky;
176 pages; Everyman 2001

The Ultimate Closed Sicilian
Gary Lane;
176 pages; Batsford 2001

Meeting 1 d4
Jacob Aagaard & Esben Lund;
176 pages; Everyman 2001

Attacking with 1 d4
Angus Dunnington;
160 pages; Everyman 2001

An Explosive Chess Repertoire For Black
Jouni Yrjola & Jussi Tella;
272 pages; Gambit 2001

The Petroff
Lasha Janjgava;
240 pages; Gambit 2001

The Sicilian Sozin
Mikhail Golubev;
272 pages; Gambit 2001
Chess books are pouring in as
usual, at a faster rate than ever, and I will attempt to cover at least a
limited fraction of these in the next few columns. In this very lengthy review,
I intend to discuss some opening books, all worthy of at least qualified
recommendation, and update my report on ChessPublishing. In a later column, I
want to direct your attention to some excellent recent efforts from other
publishers, including German ones.
Before I forget, reader Russ Palmeri
pointed out that the link I gave to the Massachusetts state chess
magazine, 'Chess Horizons', was in error. The correct link is this:
Chess
Horizons
I had intended to say
something about the website ChessPublishing.com at the end of this review.
However, when I went there and noticed the nature of its new features, I felt
that it was a priority to inform readers about what was going on. It seems to
me that the site has improved in some very important ways, and I think that
chess professionals and anyone who plays regularly in leagues and open
tournaments should strongly consider subscribing. I know that I just love this
site and find it indispensable.
As described in Review #18 and
lightly supplemented later, ChessPublishing is a subscription site that
features monthly updates of openings by GMs and IMs (mostly the former). One
can subscribes to a single opening site (e.g., 1.e4 e5, the
Nimzo-Indian&Benoni, the French, and so forth), three sites for the cost of
two, or get all of the sites. See the site above for a preview, details, and
subscription information.
The original idea of the site
is that one needn't wait for Informant or chess magazines, either of which can
take many months after the game to arrive, to see key games and notes in any
opening. This is attractive enough if you're preparing for a tournament in the
near future; now, however, it has become easy to get a detailed review of all
the previous monthly columns, while the ease of downloading annotated games in
PGN (allowing conversion to the most popular formats) has improved
dramatically. Downloading options include the most recent month's update (see
below) and any games from a particular ECO code from the last 3 months, a year,
or any recent time frame that you're interested in.
I talked very briefly in an
earlier column about a major component of this improvement, the supplemental
program 'ChessPub'. Both this and the original ChessPublishing program can be
downloaded for free, and ChessPublishing subscribers get both (related)
services. ChessPub makes it possible to use most of the download options
mentioned above. It is convenient to use, much more so than ChessPublishing for
quickly locating the games you want without having to open games that you're
not interested in. But in the ChessPublishing home site itself, one can now
quickly download the most recent month's update by itself, which is very useful
to have a copy of and examine what's just been added. What's more, beginning
with February updates, the home site now allows you to see or download an Adobe
Acrobat file that is an e-book of variations for that opening. This consists of
a systematic overview of the entire opening that contains comments by the
titled player and references to games that have previously appeared. These
references can then be checked in ChessPub (simultaneously, with the Acrobat
and ChessPub windows open) to see the complete game and notes.
There are still a couple of
columns that are lagging in their updates and thus don't yet have the e-book
feature or the ability to download just the last month's update with one click.
Any such lag threatens the usefulness of the product, but I only saw two such
cases out of 12 sites, and they will presumably be brought up to speed. On the
theme of the rest of this review, one bonus site contains suggested repertoires
for various needs (people with minimal study time, those who love gambits,
etc.). I don't have time to look at individual sites right now, but they do
vary in level of coverage. For some feeling about the sites and authors, one
can refer to my column #18 , but a lot has changed since then. In any case,
this site is a unique and valuable resource for all of us, one that I would not
do without.
This column's general theme is
opening repertoire books. The interesting thing about the first four books
above from Everyman is that they purport to supply the reader with a complete
way to play with or against 1.e4 or 1.d4. That's a broader task than an author
usually undertakes, and in the Gambit book that follows these four, the reader
is given a repertoire for Black against everything that White can play! So we
have some ambitious efforts to talk about. I should say that due to the severe
page restrictions (considering the scope), the four Everyman books are probably
best up to about the 2200 player, and they are rather sophisticated for those
below, say 1600, due to both the detail and paucity of explanation. But within
that range, a serious student who truly wants to develop an understanding of
openings will get more than his money's worth.
I'll concentrate first upon
the 1.e4 books, including Gary Lanes Closed Sicilian effort. Let's begin with
'Attacking with 1 e4' by John Emms, an author who has appeared often in this
column. How do you get a king's pawn repertoire into 160 pages? Clearly the
variations chosen have to be relatively easy to present and not in the
theoretical mainstream. Right away, we know what the big problem is: what to do
versus the Sicilian Defence. The Open Sicilians with 2.Nf3 and 3.d4 have
thousands of pages of crucial theory, but then again, nothing else really gives
White much to shout about (hence the popularity of 1...c5 !). The usual
solution would be to present the 2.c3 variation, the Bb5+ systems, the Grand
Prix lines, or, as Emms recommends, the traditional Closed Sicilian (1.e4 c5
2.Nc3 and 3.g3). We will examine that shortly. The other major suggested lines
are: the Bishop's Opening versus 1...e5 (an efficient solution, but still using
up 31 pages); 2.c4 versus the Caro-Kann, the King's Indian Attack versus the
French, the '150 Attack' versus both the Modern and Pirc Defences; the Exchange
Variation versus the Alekhine, 3.Bb5+ versus the 2...Nf6 Scandinavian and
standard lines versus the 2...Qxd5 Scandinavian.
There are two things I should point
out here. Apart from the 150 Attack, this is not an 'attacking'
repertoire at all. The lines are solid and even a little passive
on average. Frankly, some of them I consider boring. But the great
advantage of this, remembering that Emms has so few pages to work
with, is that he has found sound and established lines that can
be learned easily and will not be refuted. They are not irregular
or speculative by any means. The other thing to note is that Emms
cares about providing fair and detailed analysis, more so than the
typical author, so you'll get a straight story, albeit without much
instructional verbiage.
'Meeting 1 e4' by Alexander
Raetsky is more specialized, of course, as Black need only choose
one defence. What better one than the Sicilian, and this choice
is particularly praiseworthy since it would be a lot easier to provide
a repertoire in this space by using, say, the Caro-Kann, the Scandinavian,
the Alekhine, or in fact any other defence except perhaps 1...e5.
Interestingly, Raetsky chooses the Sicilian Four Knights Variation,
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 e6; and 6...Bb4 versus
6.Ndb5, so that at least we are spared still more published material
on the Sveshnikov! The Four Knights line is very solid and probably
underrated, and can fit within the space provided without cheating
on the coverage of the other variations like 2.c3, the Rossolimo
(3 Bb5), the Grand Prix Attack, and yes, the Closed Sicilian. I
am very positive about this book, which if nothing else should be
quite a help for the Sicilian player who wants some very up-to-date
theory on these ancillary lines.
I am going to pull the
time-tested reviewer's dirty trick of comparing what each book has to say about
the other's recommendations, i.e., at the point that they overlap. In order to
get still another viewpoint, I have compared their analysis to Gary Lane's very
useful work 'The Ultimate Closed Sicilian'. That book (from Batsford) is a
broader version of his earlier 'Winning With the Closed Sicilian', and gives a
lot of options for Black rather than concentrating only upon White's attempts
to get an advantage. Nevertheless, browsing through the book, I notice that the
illustrative games seem to be one win for White after another, with the
occasional draw. In fact, I only saw one 0-1 (although there must be a couple
others?), in the very last game of the book with Kasparov playing Black. This
is not so important, but one has to do some digging in the notes and sometimes
question the analysis if you need to find something you like for Black. For
those willing to do so, this should be a very useful book for players of the
Sicilian or those opposing it.
Anyway, what does Raetsky
recommend versus Emms' Closed Sicilian? After 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3, he somewhat
surprisingly suggests the old 2...e6 line, intending ...d5 next. Before we get
to 3.g3 d5, I wondered whether White might now play 3.Nf3, perhaps intending to
return to an Open Sicilian by 4.d4. For Raetsky, this poses no problem, since
3...Nc6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nf6 is his main line. But for a Najdorf or Dragon
player, this could be a problem with 2...e6. Maybe Black could play 3.Nf3 d5
4.exd5 exd5 5.d4 (5.Bb5+!?), which is an old Marshall line usually arising from
2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5, and now although 5.Nc3 is played, 5.Bb5+! is
considered extremely strong. Therefore, in the Closed Sicilian order with Nc3,
Black could perhaps prevent Bb5+ by 5...c4, intending ...Bb4 and ...Nf6 or
...Ne7 ? I don't know where there might be any mention or discussion of this,
but I find it interesting.
Back to the comparison. After
2.Nc3 e6 3.g3 d5 4.exd5 exd5, we have two moves dealt with by each book
(Emms offers a double repertoire):
I 5.d4 (a Lane
specialty), when 5...cxd4 is the main move. Raetsky mentions 5...Nc6 6.dxc5
6.d4 7.Ne4 Bxc5 as an alternative, and Emms continues 8.Nxc5 Qa5+ 9.Bd2 Qxc5
10.Bg2 (formerly assessed as good for White) 10...Bf5'!', which he analyses as
being quite okay for Black (probably =+, in my opinion). This is typical of
Emms, who isn't afraid to bolster the case of the side that he opposes. He
prefers 8.Bg2 Bf5 (maybe just 8...Bb4+ ?) 9.Ne2 (Lane gives 9.Nxc5 Qa5+ 10.c3
Qxc5 as being roughly equal) 9...Qe7 10.Nxc5 Qxc5 11.c3 dxc3 (11...d3 is very
interesting and unclear, as Emms sees it) 12.Nxc3 Rd8 13.Qe2+ Nge7 14.Be3 Qa5
15.Rd1 with advantage, but instead 14...Qd6! ensures that ...Bd3 will happen
and seems to equalize.
So already we see that even a
sideline may frustrate White's ambitions. But returning to 5...cxd4,
Emms main line goes 6.Qxd4 Nf6 (only Lane analyses 6...Be6, without finding an
advantage for White) 7. Bg5 Be7 8.Bb5+ (Both Lane and Raetsky feel that 8.0-0-0
is equal) 8...Nc6 9.Bxf6 Bxf6 10.Qc5 ('!' Lane - a Goering Gambit Reversed with
White having the unhelpful extra move g3) 10...Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 Qe7+ 12.Qxe7+ Kxe7
(Raetsky stops: 'with a probable draw') 13.0-0-0 Be6 14.Ne2 Kd6 ('!' Emms, and
'?!' Lane, but only because it gave Lane as White the chance to get to a drawn
game against Nunn! Hardly an advertisement for 5.d4) 15.Rhe1 Kc5 16.c4 dxc4
17.Bxc6 and now 17...Kxc6 is apparently easiest, when Lane says 'I can quickly
head for a draw after 18.Nd4+ ...' etc. As Emms shows, 17...bxc6 is also fine.
Thus 5.d4 isn't
challenging for a great number of reasons, or even very pleasant for White. So
let's look at II 5.Bg2 Nf6 and now:
A 6.Nge2 d4 7.Ne4 Nxe4
8.Bxe4 Nd7 9.d3 (Emms prefers 9.0-0 Nf6 10.Bg2 Bd6 -- 9...Be7 looks even safer
-- 11.c3!? , but apart from 11...d3 12.Nf4 0-0 13.Nxd3 Bxg3, which is a
Spassky-Kasparov game that everyone quotes and agrees is balanced, Emms again
very honestly supplies 11...0-0 12.cxd4 cxd4 13.d3 Re8 as Black's 'safest route
to equality', with which Lane agrees) 9...Nf6 10.Bg2 Bd6 11.0-0 0-0 , and Black
has had the better of the play here after 12.Bf4 Bg4! or 12.h3 Be6! or 12.c3
Re8. Raetsky naturally likes this line as well.
So Emms keeps at it and
suggests that B 6.d3 is better, continuing 6...d4 (Unfortunately for the
prosecution, Lane already shows that Black can do well enough with 6...Be7
7.Nge2 d4 here, and after 8.Ne4, he gives 2 games where 8...Nd5 equalizes.
Other examples show that 8...0-0 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Nxf6+ Bxf6 is also quite
reasonable, provided that Black answer 11.Nf4 with 11...Re8 or 11...Bf5, but
not 11...Be5? 12.Nd5 Bd6 13.Qh5!) 7.Ne4 Nxe4 8.dxe4. This is a better formation
for White to try to get some play from, although it's nothing special: 8...Nc6
9.Ne2 Be7 10.0-0 0-0 11.Nf4 Bd6 (Topalov played 11...Bg5! here, to exchange the
bad bishop, and this looks fully equal. Emms wants to play 12 Re1 Re8 13.Nd5 or
12.Nd5, but I don't believe this yields anything because of Black's space and
good bishop. He can play just ...Be6, and has ideas like ...Rb8 and ...b5
available) 12.Re1 Re8 13.Nd5 Be6 14.c4 Rb8 15.h3 b5 'with perfectly good play'
according to Raetsky.
All in all, 2...e6 looks very
comfortable for Black. So Raetsky wins the mini-debate, but only because Emms
is handicapped: we all know that the Closed Sicilian isn't about to give White
the advantage! One might fairly argue, however, that White gets at least as
interesting play as he does by means of 2.c3 or the Grand Prix.
No more lengthy comparisons,
but I want to discuss the two 1.d4 books. Angus Dunnington's 'Attacking with
1.d4' has one extreme contrast with Emms' book: most of his variations, with
the particular options that he suggests, are indeed attacking lines. For
example, he recommends (a) the Marshall Gambit (3.Nc3 e6 4.e4!?) versus the
Semi-Slav, and versus 3.Nc3 Nf6, he suggests 4.Bg5!?. Note that the latter line
is enterprising and fun, but has the risk that one can easily stand worse; (b)
the Four Pawns Attack versus both the King's Indian and Benoni; (c) 4.f3 versus
the Nimzo-Indian; (d) the Queen's Gambit Accepted with 3.e4 (with 33 pages of
theory??); and (e) 2.c4 and 3.Nc3 versus the Dutch, followed by 4.h4 versus the
Leningrad. Two exceptions to this aggressiveness are the Queen's Gambit
Declined, very conventionally dealt with, and the 4.Bf4 versus the Grunfeld.
Not surprisingly, I take issue with quite a bit more of Dunnington's rather
optimistic analysis than I do with Emms' or Raetsky's. In every opening that I
had previously studied for one reason or another, I found what I think are
mistakes. But that's the nature of such an ambitious, attacking approach, and
many of these lines aren't as well worked out. In my opinion, the 1.d4 player
can get useful weapons and have great fun by picking and choosing among these
systems. But don't expect a complete repertoire. Although the lack of an Index
of Variations or any clue as to the contents makes it difficult to see (at
least Everyman used to have end-of-chapter charts; see below), Dunnington just
skips a number of fairly early and legitimate moves for Black. The best
attitude is to enjoy the ideas and do your own investigation.
'Meeting 1 d4' by Danish
players Jacob Aagaard and Esben Lund (also referred to as 'A+L' below) is a
complete repertoire based upon the Tarrasch Defence to the Queens Gambit.
The authors also cover the irritating 1.d4 d5 2 Bg5 very nicely, and deal with
all reasonable orders stemming from 2 Nf3, for example, London Systems and
Colles. One slip is that the Catalan is given as transposing to a Tarrasch, but
unfortunately several of White's legitimate chances to deviate are not
considered. Remarkably, and I think that this is a great touch, A+L also give
Black systems against many moves other than 1.d4 ! The chapter on Reti systems
(1.Nf3) is particularly well done. Nearly every top player seems to use early
...Bg4 systems against it, and yet I've never seen a published overview of the
lines and ideas. In addition, we get the authors' solutions to 1.c4 (they try
to get back to the Tarrasch, naturally), as well as 1 g4, 1 b4, 1 b3, etc.!
What I like about this is that the authors were by no means obliged to provide
such material, but it is certainly useful for the average player to have all in
one book. I should also mention the authors' special effort to appeal to less
experienced players with informative discussions of typical positions. I
suspect that of the four books, this one does the best job for the average
player, whereas the Emms and Raetsky books could well be used by 2200 players,
and even stronger ones. Dunnington's work is sometimes superficial and
sometimes dense and technical, so it isn't easily categorized.
There are a few negatives
about 'Meeting 1.d4'that I should mention. Every once in a while the authors
slip into sarcastic and dogmatic commentary for no good reason, using words
like 'stupid' and 'inferior' when neither fits the situation (this example
below). Discussing the Veresov (1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bg5), they say of 2.Nc3,
'We could hardly imagine a better day than when an opponent finally decides to
play like this. The move is utterly stupid and does not fit with 1.d4. The
c-pawn should be in front of the knight, not behind it'. Poor GM Gufeld, who
has written a whole book about this system! And after all, players like
Spassky, Smyslov, and Bronstein all played 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bg5 more than once
(Bronstein repeatedly), whereas in more recent times we have seen Vaganian,
Lputjan, Khalifman play it, as well as several probably intelligent players who
have made it a major part of their repertoire, such as Miles, Alburt, Bellin,
Hort, Hodgson, etc. And as so often happens when one is cocky, A&L's
analysis doesn't stand up to scrutiny, neglecting what theory gives in the two
lines that that they offer, e.g., 3...Nbd7 4.f3 c5 5.e4 cxd4 6.Bxf6 dxc3
('risky' Gufeld) 7.Bxc3 dxe4 8.fxe4 e6 9.Nf3 (obviously better than
9.Qf3 Qh4+, as in A&L), which not only looks better for White, but has been
played twice with White gaining an edge. They don't even mention 4.Qd3, or 4.e3
(which I feel is best, a tempo up on an established Black system), and they say
that 4.Nf3 is 'inferior', giving an unnecessary pawn sacrifice for White that
fails. Why not simply present a proposed solution to a legitimate system and
leave it at that?
The author's use of English
can also be a problem (I'm assuming that there was no translator). In some
parts such as the introductions, they do okay - there are some missing
prepositions, redundancies, mismatches between noun and verb and the like, but
the meaning is generally clear. But elsewhere even I, who care about content
much more than style, felt that enough was enough, e.g., 'Our first game is by
the absolute idol for administrating the black pieces in this system.' I don't
think that this is entirely the authors' fault: Where is the editor? Or
is there an editor (only a 'commissioning editor' is mentioned)?
Faults aside, the Tarrasch
Defence is an excellent choice for a repertoire book aimed at mid-range
players. At worst, it tends to leave Black with technical disadvantages
requiring White to play very accurately to actually win the game. I discussed
in my strategy book, for example, how Black's record with a ...c6/..d5 pawn
structure versus White's d4 and open c-file really isn't so bad. Black is
almost never blown off the board, and gets quite a few attacking chances in
return for the structural problems that he can saddled with. In addition, the
theory is very well developed, as is shown by the fact that almost all of the
main games (around which the book is organized) are older ones. This at least
means that one doesn't have to keep up with a great deal of (or any?) new
theory.
However, in any complex system
with so many side variations, it's essential for the reader to know where he
is. I know the Tarrasch fairly well, and even I had a difficult time finding
the variations I wanted to look at. There is no Index of Variations, the
Contents are as broad as possible, and neither at the beginning nor the end of
the chapters is there a chart, variation summary, or any description of the
organization at all! Another odd decision was to include no Bibliography, which
is not as important as an index but still very useful information.
Looking at the other Everyman
books, John Emms has done what one would expect of a responsible author, giving
both a full Index of Variations and a good bibliography. Raetsky also has no
Index of Variations or chart of them, but he does carefully mention the
important lines and his preferences in his chapter conclusions, so that one has
some idea of where to look and what he thinks. He has no Bibliography.
Dunnington has no Index or charts regarding variations, and includes a very
short Bibliography. I guess one obvious question is not just why this material
has been skipped or skimped upon, but why there doesn't seem to be a standard
policy about its inclusion. The Batsford book by Lane, by the way, has no
Bibliography but a detailed Index of Variations. In general, the lack of a
Bibliography leads one to think that important sources have been neglected. Of
the booksd without extenxive Bibliographies, neither the 3 Everyman books nor
the 2 Gambit books below cite many sources (sometimes none?), and my impression
is that they are almost exclusively mostly cobbled together from databases. As
explained before, this is an easy but lazy way to write an opening book, one
that can only hurt the end product.
While on that subject, Jouni
Yrjölä and Jussi Tella's 'An Explosive Chess Opening Repertoire for
Black' has a substantial Index of Variations, as all Gambit opening books do.
Nevertheless, although most Gambit books have bibliographies as well, this one
doesn't and neither does 'The Petroff' by Lasha Janjgava. One would think that
Yusupov's Petroff book would be an essential source in the latter case.
Golubev's recent 'Sozin Sicilian', mentioned below, has both, with a
particularly good variation index.
In any case, I'm having
trouble as a reviewer with the subjects of recent Gambit opening books: I don't
know enough about the openings! This is particularly odd with respect to
Mikhail Golubev's 'The Sicilian Sozin', because I used to play 6.Bc4 versus
both the Najdorf and Classical (...Nf6/....d6/...Nc6) Sicilians. A slight
change has taken place over the years, however: that novelty I had prepared in
1973 on move 10 now covers 2 dense pages with key games diverging at move 24! I
had stopped at move 12, planning of course to play the wrong idea. So I'm going
to just mention that book's existence. Golubev has an excellent and growing
reputation stemming in part from his Dragon work, and I have already heard that
this is an excellent book.
Similarly, I haven't kept up
with Petroff theory. This is still a very hot opening among the world's elite,
as a look at any top tournament will show. Janjgava has obviously put a lot of
effort into this book, with over 200 pages of densely packed material, with
quite a bit of original analysis to fill theoretical gaps. Sometimes he strings
together too many noteless games for my taste. Authors in general seem to think
that game continuations are theoretically best, which of course is very seldom
true. In fact, none of the books reviewed in this column are skeptical enough
for my liking. The other issue is that Janjgava, as in his excellent 'The
Queen's Gambit and Catalan for Black', has almost no prose in this book at all.
Even more importantly from my perspective, he doesn't assess the relative
strengths of various lines, even at the end of chapters. We could really use
more of his opinions to guide us, as very few people will have time to read
entire chapters, and it would also be nice to know what he recommends for both
colours and how the main overall variations of the book stand.
Those issues aside, I checked
two recent GM Petroff games and found the relevant analysis to be absolutely
accurate and thorough. I also looked at two irregular sidelines that I've
examined with my student: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.Bd3!? and
5.c4!?. Both of these, by the way, have been well-commented upon in more than
one of Paul Motwani's 1.e4 e5 Chesspublishing updates. The 5.c4 lines got 5
pages of coverage! Amazing. I disagreed with some assessments and found some of
my own ideas missing; but for one thing, these are new lines that have had
considerable post-publication play, and one can never anticipate all the ideas
in a specialized area like this. All in all, I'm impressed with this book,
keeping in mind that I know little about its subject matter.
Grandmaster Jouni
Yrjölä wrote 'Easy Guide to the Classical Sicilian', but I don't know
much more about him. With Jussi Tella, he has produced a fascinating volume of
ideas for Black after 1...d6. This move is played after 1.e4, 1.d4, 1.c4,
1.Nf3, 1.b3, etc.
At least Yrjölä and
Tella's ('Y & T') book partially concerns some openings that I've had
experience with, e.g., the Pirc Defense, as well as English Opening lines such
as (by transposition) 1.d4 d6 2.c4 e5 3.Nf3 e4 4.Ng5 and 1.d4 d6 2.c4 e5 3.Nc3
exd4 4.Qxd4. The main anti-d4 line is based upon an early ...e5, as in the two
examples I just gave. But against 2.Nf3, Y&T suggest the increasingly
popular 2...Bg4. They give some very close analysis of this system, including
the most obscure moves. I had recently seen a New In Chess Magazine article
that surveyed the odd-looking 3.Qd3 in this position (threatening Qb5+!). Since
it casually mentioned Y&T's book, I went to see what they felt. To my
surprise, I found that the NIC author had done very little else but use the
games and analysis from their book! Indeed, I suspect that the authors have
extended the presentation of some of these irregular lines about as far as they
can be stretched until further examples fill the gap. The density of their
coverage is impressive. There is much more prose than with Janjgava, with some
general positional explanation, although the emphasis is on games and analysis.
Fortunately, we get a good idea of what the authors think about each line the
numerous conclusions which follow both sections and chapters.
I didn't look at the Pirc
section much, but it has another indication that no one ever looks at analysis
from my reviews (I wonder if Carsten Hansen has noticed the same thing?). For
the third time, I have to point out the same gap in analysis (previously
mentioned in my reviews of 'The Ultimate Pirc' and 'Pirc Alert!') in the very
main, critical Classical Variation. White is better, I believe in the note to
13.Nd3 on page 179 following 8.Qd2 e5 9.d5 Ne7 10.Rad1 Bd7 11.Ne1 b5 12.a3 a5,
and now 13.b4. Anyway, this is important to solve. You may reference those
reviews.
As before in this column, we
have an example of a book that has many hidden riches but it requires serious
study and work to extract the full benefit from. As the reader may know by now,
I believe in this kind of book. I think that it is better for preparation, for
checking ones games after they've been played, for research and for the
unearthing of new ideas. But there are many who prefer the handholding that is
offered by books with more explanation and a more superficial examination of
variations. It's an ongoing argument, and applies to both this and the Petroff
book, which are both examples of the moves-and-analysis school, the Petroff
book taking this to the extreme. If nothing else, books like this will retain
their practical value well into the future.
There is a list of new chess books
sold by the London Chess Centre including many of those review here
at: http://www.chess.co.uk/books2001.html.
More books can be found here.
'To comment upon these
reviews, you can contact John Watson at johnwatson@aol.com. Please do not email
him for other purposes, e.g., for advice, information, opinions, etc.'
|